Resources

In 2021, reported fraud losses experienced a significant increase, reaching $5.8 billion, which represented a surge of over 70 percent within a single year [1]. To combat the rise in financial fraud and money laundering, one effective strategy is to reduce the prevalence of anonymous bank accounts and closely monitor suspicious activities. Financial organizations, including banks, credit unions, and Fortune 500 financial firms, need to adopt measures to know their customers and continuously monitor for risk factors. This process is known as KYC or "Know Your Customer" [1].
 
While the specific programs to meet KYC requirements are developed by individual organizations, financial institutions must comply with complex regulations to verify customer identity, known as KYC [1]. It is essential for businesses in various industries to prioritize KYC compliance; non-compliance can result in steep fines, increased fraud risk, and reduced consumer trust [1].
 
KYC, which stands for "Know Your Customer," is a due diligence process employed by financial companies to verify the identity of their customers and assess and monitor their risk [2]. The purpose of KYC is to ensure that customers are who they claim to be [2]. Complying with KYC regulations plays a crucial role in preventing money laundering, terrorism financing, and other types of fraud [2]. By verifying a customer's identity during the account opening process and continuously monitoring transaction patterns, financial institutions can more accurately identify suspicious activities [2]. To meet KYC requirements, clients are typically required to provide proof of their identity and address, such as ID card verification, face verification, biometric verification, and document verification [2]. Examples of KYC documents include a passport, driver's license, or utility bill [2]. KYC is not only essential for determining customer risk but also a legal requirement to comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws [2].
 
The importance of KYC in banking lies in its role as a legal requirement for financial institutions and financial services companies to establish the identity of their customers and identify risk factors [3]. KYC procedures help prevent various financial crimes, including identity theft, money laundering, financial fraud, terrorism financing, and other illegal activities [3]. Failing to meet KYC requirements can lead to severe consequences, including substantial fines and penalties [3]. The implementation of KYC regulations gained momentum after the 9/11 attacks, leading to stricter requirements under the Patriot Act [3].
 
Under the Patriot Act's Title III, financial institutions are required to fulfill two core components of KYC: the Customer Identification Program (CIP) and Customer Due Diligence (CDD) (CDD may also include Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for high risk or suspicious activity clients.)[3]. The current KYC procedures embrace a risk-based approach to counter identity theft, money laundering, and financial fraud [3]. KYC helps establish proof of a customer's legal identity, preventing the creation of fake accounts and identity theft through forged or stolen documents [3]. Additionally, it limits the ability of criminal sectors to use dummy accounts for illegal activities such as narcotics, human trafficking, smuggling, tax fraud and racketeering [3]. KYC also helps prevent fraudulent financial activities, such as sham loans or fraudulent loan applications using fake or stolen IDs to obtain funding through fraudulent accounts [3].
 
AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and KYC (Know Your Customer) are closely related but distinct concepts. AML refers to the framework of legislation and regulations to which financial institutions must adhere in order to prevent money laundering, while KYC is a key component of the overall AML framework, requiring organizations to know their customers and verify their identities [3]. Financial institutions are responsible for developing their own KYC processes and ensuring compliance with specific AML standards dictated by any applicable jurisdiction or country [3].
 
Financial institutions that deal with customers while opening and maintaining financial accounts are required to have KYC processes in place [3]. This includes banks, credit unions, wealth management firms, broker-dealers, finance tech applications (fintech apps) depending on their activities, private lenders, and lending platforms [3]. KYC regulations have become increasingly critical for almost any institution involved in financial transactions due to the need to limit fraud, as well as the requirements imposed by banks on organizations with whom they conduct business [3].

The taxation of plaintiff litigation recoveries is confusing. But it’s important to know the right answers. This is because the income tax consequences are so significant, especially where there are “double tax” issues.

10 things to know:

1. Recoveries in connection with personal injuries are not always tax-free.

2. Many other types of individual plaintiff recoveries are taxable.‍

Compensatory and emotional distress damages for physical injuries are tax-free, but the related punitive damages and interest are taxable.

These include non-physical injuries and related emotional distress, mental anguish, defamation, breach of contract, malpractice, fraud, securities law violations, intellectual property and more.

3. Many individual plaintiffs receiving taxable recoveries CANNOT DEDUCT their legal fees.‍‍

Personal attorney fees are “miscellaneous itemized deductions,” which are nondeductible. IRC §67(g). There are limited exceptions (e.g., employment discrimination, whistleblower). It’s important to know whether the IRC permits the deduction of your attorney fee.

4. The U.S. Supreme Court held that plaintiffs must include the attorney fee portion of their taxable recovery in income – creating the double tax.‍

This is the 2004 ruling in Commissioner v. Banks. As a result, in taxable cases where the attorney fee is not deductible, both the plaintiff and lawyer pay tax on the attorney fee portion of the recovery – hence the “double tax.”

5. In “double tax” situations, plaintiffs in high-tax jurisdictions end up with little or nothing.

A plaintiff might keep 10% after paying 40% to their lawyer and 50% in taxes. (Looking at you California!) And if their lawyer had significant expenses that are not covered by the contingent fee, the plaintiff may end up with nothing.

6. Defendants are subject to huge 1099 penalties in taxable cases if they don’t issue a 1099, or if they exclude the attorney fee portion.

The penalty can be 10% of the unreported amount, without limit. IRS Regulation 1.6041-1(f); IRC §6722(e).

7. Plaintiff lawyers must consider client tax issues.

American Bar Association (ABA) materials advise that “competent representation” of plaintiffs requires “considering the tax implications of the settlement.” ABA, Ethical Guidelines for Settlement Negotiations (August, 2002). Ethics rules require that personal injury lawyers tell clients the consequences of not addressing taxes or seeking competent tax advice.

8. Many suggested ways of reducing plaintiff recovery taxes don’t work.

These include reporting to the IRS only the portion of the recovery received by the plaintiff (excluding the attorney fee portion), treating the attorney-client relationship as a partnership or business, or excluding the structured portion of the attorney’s fees. Not only do these not work, they subject the plaintiff to massive penalties and interest if the IRS finds out.

9. Plaintiffs with taxable recoveries can increase their after-tax recovery if they act before a final resolution of the claim.

One way to do so is to draft the complaint or settlement agreement to consider the taxes (to the extent the facts allow). Another way to avoid taxation on the attorney fee portion of the recovery is to contribute the claim to a Plaintiff Recovery Trust (PRT). A PRT uses a traditional charitable trust planning arrangement, modified to the litigation context to achieve this result. There are other methods to reduce the taxes associated with a taxable recovery, such as selling the claim.

10. Addressing taxes after settlement is hard.

Tax planning to reduce plaintiff taxes on their recoveries is possible while the case is contingent and doubtful, i.e., not finally resolved. Careful planning is required. There are limited opportunities once the claim resolves. In this regard, few accountants are familiar with plaintiff recovery taxation matters and they tend to get involved only after the recovery, when it’s too late.

The world of personal injury settlements is often a complex and intricate labyrinth. One particular aspect, frequently misunderstood, revolves around the taxation of settlements that incorporate punitive damages or interest awarded on the settlement amount. As a critical piece of the puzzle, understanding the nuances of these tax implications is paramount. Let's delve into the intricacies of the Tax Implications of Personal Injury Settlements with Punitive Damages.

Personal injury settlements frequently consist of compensatory and punitive damages. Compensatory damages serve to restore victims to their pre-injury or pre-illness financial state; thus, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) under Section 104(a)(2) allows such damages received due to physical injuries or illness to be exempt from taxation and provides offer relief to victims and help them recover without the burden of additional tax liabilities.

Contrarily, punitive damages, and interest, the black sheep of the personal injury settlements family, are considered taxable income. Unlike compensatory damages, punitive damages do not restore the victim to their pre-injury or pre-illness state but penalize the defendant for their egregious misconduct and only serve as a penalty deterrent against similar future behavior. Consequently, under U.S. tax law, punitive damages fall squarely into the taxable income category.

A pivotal decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in O'Gilvie v. United States reinforced the idea that punitive damages linked to personal injury suits, regardless of their association with physical injury or illness, are taxable. Thus, punitive damages are includable in the recipient's gross income for tax purposes.

Recipients of personal injury settlements that include punitive damages must report these amounts. Only the punitive and interest components must be listed as "Other Income" on IRS form Form 1040 (2022), Line 8 (See Schedule 1), allowing the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to correctly identify the income's nature and apply the appropriate taxation.

Another tax problem arises when punitive damages and attorney fees are contingency-based.  In Commissioner v. Banks and Commissioner v. Banaitis, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that, for federal income tax purposes, the percentage of a monetary judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent fee agreement is taxable income to the taxpayer. The Court ruled that when a settlement or judicial award constitutes income, the taxpayer's income shall include the portion paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. A possible solution to avoid the plaintiff's taxation of the attorney fees portion of punitive damages is the Plaintiff Recovery Trust.

However, it is essential to remember that legal landscapes can vary, and tax laws and regulations are subject to change. It is, therefore, advisable to consult with a tax professional or a personal injury attorney who can navigate the intricate legal and tax pathways of personal injury settlements.

Negotiating settlements also requires a careful evaluation of the tax implications. Plaintiffs can receive lump sums or periodic payments of their settlements to spread and minimize tax liability. An example of such a tactic would be to accept payment in installments over several years or the Plaintiff Recovery Trust, which provides lump-sum payments.

It is crucial, however, to refrain from attempts to evade taxes by misrepresenting punitive damages as compensatory damages. Such actions can lead to IRS penalties and interest on unpaid taxes.

In conclusion, the path of personal injury settlements and their corresponding tax implications can be challenging. While compensatory damages provide financial restoration to victims, punitive damages act as a deterrent for outrageous behavior. The contrasting tax implications of these damages reflect their differing purposes. One should always seek expert tax advice to ensure tax compliance.

As the adage goes, only two things are certain in life - death and taxes. It is, therefore, vital to approach taxation with preparedness and diligence and begin by learning more here – Minimizing Taxation of Settlements.

Introduction: Qualified Settlement Funds vs. IOLTA Accounts

Lawyers and law firms are bound by specific rules and regulations when managing client funds to ensure ethical and responsible financial practices. Two standard methods for handling client funds are through Qualified Settlement Funds (QSFs) and Interest on Lawyer Trust Accounts (IOLTAs). In this article, we will explore whether a lawyer or law firm may create a Qualified Settlement Fund by discretion or at the client’s direction; or if the lawyer or law firm must deposit the client funds in an IOLTA.

IOLTA Accounts: A Brief Overview

IOLTAs have been an essential tool for law firms since their introduction in 1981. Before IOLTAs, lawyers and law firms were required to deposit client funds into non-interest-bearing checking accounts, ensuring that lawyers and law firms couldn’t financially benefit from their clients’ money. However, with the introduction of IOLTAs, lawyers and law firms were permitted to place these funds into an interest-bearing trust account, with the interest being used to fund legal representation for indigent defendants by the respective state’s Legal Services Corporation.

Additionally, the interest generated from IOLTAs is used to finance various other activities such as providing legal aid for low-income residents, funding law school scholarship programs, improving the administration of justice, assisting those who cannot afford legal services, and supporting non-profit organizations and public service programs. It’s important to note that while IOLTA programs are available in every state, the specific guidelines and requirements may vary.

Three significant shortcomings of holding funds in an IOLTA are:

• Funds placed in an IOLTA lose the ability to be assigned to periodic payments arrangements, and
  
• The client’s best interests are not protected because the client receives no interest on the funds held in the IOLTA, and the lost economic benefit may be material for larger settlements, and
  
• IOLTAs only provides up to $250,000 of FDIC insurance. QSF platforms have proprietary banking networks that can provide up to $240 million of FDIC insurance protecting the client settlement to a greater degree
  

Qualified Settlement Funds: An Overview

QSFs are another mechanism used in the legal industry to receive settlement payments. QSFs provide a way to hold and manage settlement proceeds before they are distributed to the intended recipients. As such, a QSF receives funds directly from the defendant and is separate and apart from any associated requirement to hold funds in an IOLTA pursuant to IRC §1.468B-1 et seq.
‍
When utilizing a QSF, the lawyer or law firm never takes possession of the settlement proceeds, and, as such, the lawyer or law firm need not place the funds in the IOLTA.

Can a Lawyer or Law Firm Create a QSF at the Client’s Direction?

In general, establishing a QSF requires the approval of a governmental authority as provided for in IRC §1.468B-1(c) et seq. While a lawyer or law firm may utilize their discretion to determine that a QSF is the best option in the circumstances, often clients direct the lawyer or law firm to create a QSF (subject to the governmental authority approval process). Lawyers or law firms may find that having a clear written directive from the client to establish a QSF eliminates any questions regarding the client’s intent and knowledge and demonstrates disclosure. Platforms like QSF360 offer simple – free to use – draft client QSF directive forms and can create a QSF in as little as one business day.

Practice point: Consider the benefit of the QSF in preserving special tax treatment, having the time to seek more competitive financial product returns, and the interest earned by the plaintiff which would all otherwise be lost if the funds were held in an IOLTA; all of which can be significant and frequently justify the small costs of utilizing a QSF in smaller settlements.

Should a Lawyer or Law Firm Deposit Client Funds in an IOLTA?

The decision to deposit client funds in an IOLTA depends on several factors, including the nature and amount of the funds and the duration for which the funds will be held. IOLTAs are primarily intended for holding smaller amounts of client funds for very short periods of time.
‍
However, in cases where a significant amount of funds (>$250,000) shall be held for a modest period of time, establishing a QSF is often a more suitable option. QSFs provide the necessary structure to manage and distribute settlement funds while ensuring compliance with legal and tax requirements and offer the benefit of additional time for the plaintiff to plan and preserve beneficial tax treatment to elect a stream of future periodic payments.
‍
Additionally, with a QSF, the client receives the credited interest earned on the funds. In cases with larger settlements (>$250,000), the client receiving the credited interest resolves several potential ethical issues for the plaintiff’s lawyer as only the QSF preserves the client’s best interests.

Choosing the Appropriate Approach

Determining whether to use a QSF or an IOLTA requires consideration of the specific circumstances and legal requirements. An often used general rule is that if the settlement exceeds $250,000, use a QSF to ensure that 100% of the settlement is covered by FDIC insurance. As always, legal professionals should adhere to all applicable ethical standards and the rules of professional conduct.

Conclusion

In summary, lawyers and law firms have options for managing client funds depending on the circumstances. While IOLTAs are commonly used for holding smaller amounts of funds for shorter periods, QSFs offer a structured approach for managing more significant settlement amounts, economically benefit the client by the receipt of earned interest, provide valuable time to plan financial decisions more carefully, and preserve unique tax options that are lost when funds are placed in an IOLTA. Understanding what is in your client’s best interest ensures ethical compliance.

‍

A Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) provides an empowering and secure way for parties in a litigation settlement (or nonlitigation dispute settlement) to manage the settlement funds. A significant aspect of QSFs, established under §1.468B-1, involves their duration, which allows for an efficient and effective settlement process.
‍
A QSF is typically established under state law and approved by a “Governmental Authority” as defined in §1.468B-1(c). These regulations cover transfers to the fund, income earned by the fund, and distributions made by the fund [2]. While not required, a court may also order that settlement proceeds be paid into a QSF [3]. The defendant or insurer pays the agreed settlement amount into the QSF in these cases. Once the fund is set up, the trustee who becomes the administrator has the option to apply §1.468B-1 through 1.468B-4 to the fund.
‍
The timeline of a QSF under these regulations is linked to the taxable years and has no stipulated maximum time frame. The provisions of §1.468B-1 through 1.468B-4 apply to the fund’s activity in associated taxable years [2]. This ensures that the fund aligns with the tax year, simplifying tax reporting and compliance.
‍
However, as noted, the QSF does not have a set expiration date defined in the regulations. Instead, its duration is tied to the completion of its purpose: distributing the settlement funds to the rightful recipients once resolving all outstanding secondary issues. As such, a QSF can have durations of multiple years or even decades. A QSF is only dissolved after the final disbursement of the funds and the filing of a “final” IRS Form 1120-SF.
‍
It’s also important to note that the QSF is treated as the owner of the settlement assets for federal income tax purposes when held in the QSF [1]. This approach offers added protection to the funds while they are held in the QSF and ensures the QSF is appropriately administered and in line with federal tax regulations.
‍
Noted tax commentators have suggested that funds held in a QSF should be disbursed within twelve (12) calendar months of resolving all associated secondary matters to avoid the potential abuse of a QSF as a mere tax deferral scheme. Platforms like QSF 360 provide integrated management of the associated QSF duration.
‍
In conclusion, a QSF’s duration under §1.468B-1 is defined by the time to fulfill its intended purpose and resolve all related secondary matters such as liens, secondary litigation, appeals, and other conditional matters. This flexible duration, combined with the safeguards of a QSF, offers a comprehensive solution for managing settlement funds. Its lifespan adheres to the taxable years for clarity in tax compliance, and the QSF enjoys the status and protection of a trust.

Qualified Settlement Funds (QSFs) offer a practical solution for parties involved in litigation (and non-litigation disputes) to fulfill monetary settlements. Notably, their formation and operation as trusts falls under the scope of regulation §1.468B-1 in the U.S. federal tax code [1][2].

Under §1.468B-1, QSFs are treated as trusts for federal income tax purposes [1]. These entities are deemed to be owned by the transferor as dictated by section 671 and its subsequent regulations. This regulation holds, except for paragraph (b) of the section and §1.468B-4, which deal with different aspects of the fund.

Importantly, if a fund, account, or trust classified as a QSF aligns with the definition of a trust under §301.7701–4, it is classified as a QSF for all purposes of the Internal Revenue Code [2]. This classification provides additional legal and financial protection for the parties involved in the settlement.

The trust formed as a QSF constitutes a separate taxable entity per section 1.468B-1(c) of the Income Tax Regulations [3]. Being separate from the parties involved, the fund can independently manage the financial obligations associated with the settlement.

The IRS’s EIN system additionally classifies a QSF under the Trust Section of the online EIN system, notwithstanding that investment income is taxed at the corporate rate and a QSF files an IRS Form 1120-SF.

Note: The settlement payments transferred in a QSF are not taxable income to a QSF. Only investment income (interest) earned by the QSF is taxable.

Moreover, the QSF trust is taxed on its modified gross income, a term defined under section 1.468B-2(b) of the Income Tax Regulations [3]. This taxation is equivalent to the maximum corporate rate, underscoring the fund's distinctness as a taxable entity.

In summary, forming QSFs as trusts provides a structured method for handling settlement funds, aligns with federal tax obligations, and offers protection for all parties involved in the legal proceeding. Adhering to regulations such as §1.468B-1 allows for a consistent, statutorily established approach to managing and distributing funds arising from settlements.

Qualified Settlement Funds (QSF) – Listicle of 12 Things to Know:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

[7/8/24] Joe Sharpe, ETPC President, explained, “QSFs are powerful financial tools to streamline and manage settlements, especially in complex cases. They provide tax benefits, flexibility, and efficient administration for all parties involved. With platforms like QSF 360™, creating and managing a QSF is quick, easy, and fully compliant. From establishing a QSF to understanding the roles of administrators, tax implications, and investment options, our comprehensive listicle covers all you need to know about these financial mechanisms.”

Learn the advantages of QSFs over other settlement structures, QSF regulatory oversight, and best practices for effective management. Make the most of your settlements with QSFs and ensure a smooth, compliant, and beneficial process.

Eastern Point Trust Company invites legal professionals, plaintiffs, and all interested parties to explore more and discover the transformative potential of QSFs in post-settlement dispute resolution. To read the complete listicle and learn more about the advantages of QSFs, visit https://www.easternpointtrust.com/articles/qualified-settlement-funds-listicle-of-12-things-to-know.

PRESS Contact
www.EasternPointTrust.com

[email protected]
Phone: 855-222-7513

###

The co-designer of the Plaintiff Recovery Trust, Lawrence Eisenberg, a tax attorney and founder of Forward Giving, Inc., a 501(c)(3) charity, publishes in Tax Notes an article addressing the double taxation of settlements.

[7/16/2024] — In a thought-provoking article published in Tax Notes* Lawrence J. Eisenberg, an experienced tax attorney, describes the perplexing issues affecting individual plaintiffs in litigation recoveries and considers how those issues can be addressed, including by using a charitably-based trust-based solution. The article “The Individual Plaintiff Tax Trap — A Conundrum and a Solution” delves into the intricacies of the taxation of litigation recoveries and addresses methods to mitigate the adverse tax consequences some individual plaintiffs face.

Background

Eisenberg’s article highlights the strange and often inconsistent tax treatment of individual plaintiff litigation recoveries under the Internal Revenue Code. Despite the Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in “Commissioner v. Banks”, which held that plaintiffs must report the entire recovery as taxable income—including the portion payable to attorneys—many plaintiffs (and their attorneys and advisors) remain unaware of the potential tax pitfalls when such recoveries do not fall under tax-free categories, e.g., damages for physical injuries.

The Individual Plaintiff Tax Trap

The crux of the issue lies in the deductibility of attorney’s fees. Some recoveries are tax-free, so attorney fee deductibility is not relevant, or allow for an above-the-line deduction of these fees. Other recoveries can result a “double tax”, because in those situations, the attorney fee portion of the recovery is taxable, but the attorney fee itself is not deductible. This leads to significantly diminished net recoveries. Eisenberg’s article includes a detailed example demonstrating how a plaintiff’s net recovery can be less than 10% of the total amount, with the government and attorneys each receiving several times more than the plaintiff!

A Trust-Based Solution

To address this inequity, Eisenberg proposes that a plaintiff affected by the double tax create a Plaintiff Recovery Trust (PRT). A PRT allows plaintiffs to transfer their litigation claims to a specially designed split-interest charitable trust. By doing so, the litigation claim becomes an asset of the trust, and any recovery is received by the trust, which then pays the net recovery to the trust beneficiaries, including the plaintiff. The PRT uses ordinary trust law principles and aims to achieve fairer tax treatment by separating the ownership of the litigation claim from the individual plaintiff.

Key Benefits of the Plaintiff Recovery Trust

- Equitable Tax Treatment: By treating the litigation claim as a trust asset, a Plaintiff Recovery Trust results in the plaintiff not being taxed on the portion of the recovery paid to their attorneys.

- Structured recovery: The PRT trust structure allows for a more organized and potentially tax-efficient distribution of recoveries. (It also permits the use of structured settlements as part of the solution.)

- Charitable Component: The PRT includes a charitable beneficiary, adding a philanthropic dimension to the solution.

Conclusion

Eisenberg’s article is a call to action for tax professionals and litigation attorneys to recognize and address the unfair tax treatment many individual plaintiffs face. The PRT trust-based solution offers a way to alleviate the financial burden imposed by current tax law, so that plaintiffs retain a fair share of their recoveries.

See the full article on the taxation of settlement proceeds.

PRESS Contact
www.EasternPointTrust.com

[email protected]
Phone: 855-222-7513

###

‍

Eastern Point Trust Company Unveils Comprehensive Guide on Navigating Post-Settlement Disputes and Complexities with Qualified Settlement Funds

[5/17/2024] — Eastern Point Trust Company is pleased to announce the release of a new guide designed to address the challenging intricacies of post-settlement litigation disputes. The guide focuses on utilizing Qualified Settlement Funds (QSFs), also known as 468B trusts, as a streamlined solution for efficient settlement fund management and dispute resolution.

It is not uncommon for secondary disputes to arise following a litigation settlement or court award. These disputes can range from family disagreements over their "fair share" to lawyers disputing fee splits, plaintiffs contesting attorney fees, and third-party lien holders emerging to stake claims against the litigation proceeds. Such complexities often hinder the settlement process and prolong the resolution.

Eastern Point Trust Company's newly released guide provides detailed insights into how QSFs can be employed to manage these disputes effectively. By offering a structured approach to fund management and tax compliance and providing the necessary time for informed decision-making, QSFs present a viable solution to post-settlement challenges.

Sam Kott, Vice President of Eastern Point Trust Company, emphasized the significance of the guide, stating, "This guide explores the advantages of QSFs, specifically their ability to address complex issues such as post-settlement disputes, secondary litigation, and lien resolution. The guide also provides direction on navigating post-settlement challenges and highlights the benefits of QSFs in achieving the best possible outcomes for all parties involved."

The guide delves into the various advantages of utilizing QSFs, including:

• Efficient Fund Management: QSFs ensure that settlement funds are FDIC-insured, reduce misallocation risks, and ensure fair distribution.
• Tax Compliance: QSFs help maintain compliance with tax regulations, thereby minimizing potential tax liabilities for the parties involved.
• Informed Decision-Making: By providing time and space for thoughtful decision-making, QSFs help to resolve disputes amicably and equitably.

Eastern Point Trust Company invites legal professionals, plaintiffs, and all interested parties to explore the guide and discover the transformative potential of QSFs in post-settlement dispute resolution. To read the complete guide and learn more about the advantages of QSFs, visit here.

PRESS Contact
www.EasternPointTrust.com

[email protected]
Phone: 855-222-7513

###

Eastern Point is proud to announce the release of its latest publication, Unveiling the Complex World of Taxable and Tax-Free Settlements.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

[5/17/2024] — Eastern Point is proud to announce the release of its latest publication, Unveiling the Complex World of Taxable and Tax-Free Settlements. This comprehensive guide delves into the intricate workings of taxable and non-taxable settlements, offering invaluable insights into compensatory damages, punitive damages, and the tax treatment of various settlement types.

Ms. Rachel McCrocklin, Eastern Point’s Chief Trust Officer, commented, “The guide provides a detailed understanding of the pivotal role of IRS Section 104 and the taxability of various settlement types. Our goal is to equip readers with the knowledge to make informed decisions and minimize potential tax liabilities.”

The guide explores strategic methods to minimize tax obligations on settlements, including leveraging structured settlement annuities, Plaintiff Recovery Trusts, and proper allocation in settlement agreements. It is an essential resource for individuals and businesses navigating the complex landscape of settlement taxation.

Arm yourself with knowledge, make informed decisions, and minimize potential tax liabilities with Eastern Point's newest guide.

For more information on Unveiling the Complex World of Taxable and Tax-Free Settlements, please visit https://www.easternpointtrust.com/articles/unveiling-tax-free-settlements-what-you-need-to-know or contact 855-222-7513.

CTRO

PRESS Contact
www.EasternPointTrust.com

[email protected]

Phone: 855-222-7513

###

‍

A new comprehensive guide has emerged catering to those seeking to conduct private placements. This guide outlines the pivotal role of escrow accounts in private placements, providing a secure, regulated structure that safeguards investor assets and boosts investor confidence.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

[5/2/2024] — A new comprehensive guide has emerged catering to those seeking to conduct private placements. This guide outlines the pivotal role of escrow accounts in private placements, providing a secure, regulated structure that safeguards investor assets and boosts investor confidence.

It reviews the advantages of choosing a trust company over a traditional bank account for escrow services, emphasizing active independent oversight that enhances transaction security and integrity.

Ned Armand, CEO, noted, “The guide also highlights the critical role of an escrow agent in managing funds prudently, ensuring a smooth progression of transactions under the regulatory frameworks.” Offerors of private equity and Reg D, Reg A, Reg A+, Reg CF, and Reg S offerings are encouraged to explore this guide, available on Eastern Point Trust Company.

PRESS Contact
www.EasternPointTrust.com

[email protected]
Phone: 855-222-7513

###

‍

In today's dynamic business landscape, where environmental liabilities pose significant challenges, the Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) emerges as a beacon of efficiency and reliability. Contrasting against traditional Environmental Remediation Trusts (ERT), Eastern Point’s QSF offers unparalleled advantages, revolutionizing the approach towards environmental liability management.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

[2/27/2024] — In today's dynamic business landscape, where environmental liabilities pose significant challenges, the Qualified Settlement Fund (QSF) emerges as a beacon of efficiency and reliability. Contrasting against traditional Environmental Remediation Trusts (ERT), Eastern Point’s QSF offers unparalleled advantages, revolutionizing the approach towards environmental liability management.

The Qualified Settlement Fund stands as a testament to expediency, with the capability to be established and funded within a mere business day, a stark contrast to the lengthy processes associated with ERTs. By swiftly assuming environmental liabilities from present and future claims under CERCLA, state, and local law, QSF ensures immediate action and resolution.

One of the most compelling aspects of QSF is its affordability, with establishment costs as low as $500. This cost-effectiveness, coupled with the tax advantages it provides over ERTs, makes QSF an attractive proposition for businesses seeking prudent financial solutions.

Flexibility is another hallmark of QSF, allowing for single-year or multi-year funding without any maximum duration constraints, ensuring adaptability to diverse business needs. Furthermore, the ability to hold real estate expands the horizons of asset management within the fund.

The benefits extend to tax optimization, with QSF accelerating the transferor's tax deduction for funds transferred to the current tax year, thereby enhancing financial planning and efficiency. Moreover, by shifting liability and associated funding transfers irrevocably to the QSF, businesses can streamline their balance sheets, mitigating risks and enhancing transparency.

In addition to these financial advantages, QSF facilitates seamless settlement agreements to capitate and resolve environmental liabilities, assuring regulators and interested parties of the irrevocable availability of funds for amelioration.

The transition to QSF not only eliminates future administrative burdens but also entrusts the fund's administration to a dedicated trustee, relieving businesses of operational complexities and enhancing focus on core activities.

In conclusion, the Qualified Settlement Fund stands as a beacon of innovation in environmental liability management, offering unmatched advantages over traditional Environmental Remediation Trusts. Its expediency, affordability, flexibility, and tax optimization capabilities redefine the landscape, empowering businesses to navigate environmental challenges with confidence and efficiency.

PRESS Contact
www.EasternPointTrust.com

[email protected]
Phone: 855-222-7513

###

Eastern Point Trust Company Announces Sponsorship Grants to National Forest Foundation

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

[10/13/2022] — Eastern Point Trust Company (“EPTC”) announced that it entered into a sponsorship with the National Forest Foundation (“NFF”) to provide grant funding in support of NFF’s mission to restore and enhance our National Forests and Grasslands.

Working on behalf of the American public, the NFF leads forest conservation efforts and promotes responsible recreation. Its mission is founded on the belief that these lands, and all they provide, are an American treasure and vital to our communities’ health.

Rachel McCrocklin, Eastern Point’s Chief Client Officer, stated, “Eastern Point welcomes the opportunity to partner with the National Forest Foundation in support of its mission to improve and protect our national lands. A portion of Eastern Point’s revenue is dedicated to funding priority reforestation and enhanced wildlife habitat by supporting the National Forest Foundation’s 50 million for Forrest campaign.”

About Eastern Point Trust CompanyWith over three decades of trustee and trust administration experience, Eastern Point is a world leader in trust innovation that provides fiduciary services to individuals, courts, and institutional clients.

Eastern Point has the benefit of practical experience and industry-leading technology, providing services to over 6,000 trusts with more than 20,000 users across the U.S. and internationally.

About The National Forest FoundationThe National Forest Foundation is the leading organization inspiring personal and meaningful connections to our National Forests, the centerpiece of America’s public lands.

PRESS Contact
www.EasternPointTrust.com

[email protected]
Phone: 855-222-7513

###

Eastern Point Trust provides services across the U.S. and internationally.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

[11/21/2022] — Eastern Point Trust Company (“EPTC”) announced recent successes of the Plaintiff Recovery Trust (“PRT”) solution in solving the Plaintiff Double Tax, which is the unfair result of 2017 legislation that can cut plaintiff recoveries in half.

Glen Armand, Eastern Point’s CEO, expressed, “Eastern Point’s gratitude for the testimonials of Mirena Umizaj, Joseph Di Gangi, Rebekah Reedy Miller, Susan Gleason, Jennifer White, Andy Rubenstein, and Zane Aubert. By utilizing the PRT, you are the catalyst for saving plaintiffs over $30 million of federal and state taxation.”

Mr. Armand also announced Joseph Tombs as Director of Plaintiff Recovery Trusts (PRT). Mr. Armand also noted, “The contributions of Lawrence Eisenberg and Jeremy Babener for partnering on our newest settlement solution.”

Settlement and financial planners and CPAs can learn and access resources on Eastern Point’s PRT Planner Page here: https://www.easternpointtrust.com/plaintiff-recovery-trust-for-planners

About Eastern Point Trust Company
Eastern Point is a world leader in trust innovation that provides fiduciary services to individuals, courts, and institutional clients across the U.S. and internationally.

With over three decades of trustee and trust administration experience, Eastern Point provides the benefits of practical experience, industry-leading technology, and innovation. Eastern Point Trust provides services across the U.S. and internationally.

About The Plaintiff Recovery Trust
The Plaintiff Recovery Trust is the proven solution to increase the amount plaintiffs keep in taxable cases. Without it, plaintiffs are taxed on the settlement proceeds paid to their lawyers. https://www.easternpointtrust.com/plaintiff-recovery-trust

PRESS Contact
www.EasternPointTrust.com

[email protected]
Phone: 855-222-7513

###

Qualified Settlement Funds (QSFs), a 468B trust, are valuable and crucial in managing litigation settlements efficiently and effectively. "QSF", which stands for "Qualified Settlement Fund", is a fund established as a trust or account established to hold settlement proceeds from litigation. According to the definition under Treasury Regulations, it is an escrow account, trust, or fund established according to an order of or approved by a government authority to resolve or satisfy claims.

This comprehensive infographic guide explains the essential aspects of Qualified Settlement Funds:

• What is a Qualified Settlement Fund and its purpose
• Key benefits
• Eligibility requirements
• The approval process
• How to create a Qualified Settlement Fund
• Qualified Settlement Fund tax treatment and tax reporting
• Investment options
• QSF administration process
• Qualified Settlement Fund Administrator role and responsibilities
• Procedures for making distributions
• Compliance and regulatory matters
• Complex cases
• Minor's Settlements

The guide provides valuable insights, tips, and rules of thumb for legal professionals, claimants, and other stakeholders about how a QSF account benefits the settlement process. A QSF offers many advantages, including immediate tax deduction for defendants, tax deferral for claimants, and efficient management of settlement proceeds. QSFs are commonly used in class action lawsuits, mass tort litigation, and cases with multiple claimants, but can also provide benefits in single claimant cases.

Setting up a QSF involves petitioning a government authority and appointing a QSF Administrator to oversee the fund. The QSF Administrator, often a platform like QSF 360, is responsible for obtaining an EIN, handling tax reporting, overseeing QSF administration, and making distributions to claimants. Online QSF portals streamline the Qualified Settlement Fund administration process.

Partnering with an experienced QSF Administrator is essential. Services like QSF 360 from specialize in QSFs for both large and small cases and can help ensure compliance with IRC § 1.468B-1 and other regulations.

In summary, Qualified Settlement Funds are a powerful tool for managing settlement proceeds. With proper planning and administration, QSFs provide significant tax benefits, enable efficient distribution of litigation proceeds, and help bring litigation closure. Understanding what is QSF and how to leverage QSFs is invaluable for any legal professional involved in today's settlements.